Monday, July 5, 2010

Movie Review: The Spirit

1
Title page!


The Spirit (2008 Lionsgate Dir. Frank Miller)

Get out your manliest whiskey for this one kids. Not because you like it, but because that's what a Real Man® is supposed to drink. Yes, once again, my love for the silly and the stupid comes through. Here’s a controversial statement for you, The Spirit is actually pretty good. Okay, yes, the movie is bad. BUT! It’s a good kind of bad. It’s a “Saturday night with friends and a bottle” bad. In fact, it’s a lot of fun if you watch it with the right mindset. Yes, that mindset is that this is going to be a fun, campy, adolescent thrill ride, but I will point out it is based on a comic book.


Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Spielberg Generation

You know what makes Steven Spielberg great? He understands his generation. If you watch his movie, there is an underlying resonance of what the Baby Boomers were going through at the time. At least, what Spielberg was going through, which it seems a lot of Boomers were also experiencing.

Look at Raiders of the Lost Ark. Under the adventure story is a theme about getting older. If there is a generational statement in Raiders it’s “Hey, I started getting old. How the hell did that happen?” It’s not the central thesis of the movie or anything, but it’s in there. Temple of Doom has him having a child, and trying to be a good (for lack of a better word) ‘parent’ while working on his own career. I haven’t seen The Color Purple in years and years, so I can’t comment about that. Like wise for Empire of The Sun and Always. However, there is an obvious theme in Last Crusade of “I’ve never really connected with my dad, and that bothers the hell out of me.” which is then complimented with Hook’s theme of “Holy shit, I haven’t connected with my kids either. If I don’t do something the cycle is going to continue.”

All of these statements are things I clearly remember my parent’s friends talking about, worrying about, and experiencing. When these movies came out, they were part of the cultural touchstones for people of that age group. I don’t see something for every movie, Jurassic Park’s only real theme seems to be that raptors are cool. However, Lost World does have a reinforcement of the “I was away working on his my things while you were growing up.” theme, which I know was a thing at the time. Since many of my friends were sort of sitting there going “Yeah, I know. Welcome to the reason all the movies in the next 20 years will be chock full of daddy issues.” Gods, but I hate daddy issues movies, I really do. I have a good relationship with my father and I’m not even remotely emo, so the last 10 to 15 years of film has really failed to touch me.

Right after that, you get another huge touchstone for the Boomers with Private Ryan. This is a movie that seems to be designed for guys born between 1946 and 1952 to turn to their fathers and scream (with tears pouring down their faces) “I UNDERSTAND YOU NOW DADDY! LET US EMBRACE IN OUR UNDERSTANDING WHILE I STILL IGNORE MY OWN KIDS! WAAAAAAAHH!!!!”

And then you have A.I.

I don’t know the deeper meaning of A.I. because I’m still waiting for that movie to end. I poke my head back in the theater every once in a while, and it’s still going on. Minority Report is just loaded up with regrets about not having enough time for all the things, blah, blah, blah, change the record. After that, you get a spate of movies I haven’t actually seen. I missed most of his ‘00s out put, except for Crystal Skull, which does contain that “We’re growing old now and we’re looking back at all the things we missed while we were busy working.” and again, that seems very much to be where the mentality of the boomers seems to be. Spielberg has more or less spent the last 30 odd years with his finger on the pulse of his generation.

I know Generation X is supposed to be a more diverse group than any previous generation, but surely some of these things are universal. Strangely though, I haven’t seen a lot of directors that make movies I really connect with. Edgar Wright has done alright with Spaced, Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, although Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World has so far left me feeling cold and asking “Why aren’t I into this?” I feel like I should totally be excited for it, but I’m just not. My point is that there doesn’t seem to be a great director like this for our generation, which could just be my perception since, as I say, I totally fail to connect with movies that are neck deep in daddy issues.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Movie Review: Black Belt Jones

1
I'd just like to point out there was no way for me not to get that look on his face, the screen freezes there for the entire time the title is up.

Black Belt Jones (1974 Warner Bros Dir. Robert Clouse)

Somehow this movie landed on spot #38 in something called The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made. We know how I feel about Worst Movie Ever lists though, right? The documentary must be pretty stupid, because this movie does not belong on a list of “Worst Movies Evar” at all. In fact, this is actually a really great movie. Who ever put it on the worst ever list for that movie was an idiot. I intend to tell you that this is actually a great movie, a hilarious movie, and I’m not convinced that the comedy is all completely unintentional. This is not “So bad it’s good”, but rather “This is just good.” Let’s dive on in and I’ll show you.


Friday, June 25, 2010

I want Michael Bay to remake Seven Samurai

HANG ON! Just hear me out on this.

It’s getting quite popular to hate Michael Bay these days. There have been people claiming he’s ruining the action movie or just cinema in general for a while now, but lately there are people who should be in his demographic who are hating on him. Now, I’ve never made it a secret that I am no Bay fan, but I’m not sure I’ve really pointed out exactly why I don’t like his stuff.

First off, I don’t think he’s ruining movies. While I may not like his style, I understand that he makes a lot of money, so someone must be plunking down their shekles to see his stuff. If that’s true, then I blame the audience for the death of true cinema… whatever the hell that actually means. I’ve seen enough of these “Cinema is dying” claims spread over a wide enough area to know that it’s just so much hokum. If movies are going downhill, which I don’t actually believe, then it’s because of what the majority decides to go see. I don’t blame Bay, who is reacting to market forces. Argue against the market if you want, but don’t blame the artist.

Some people claim to hate Bay because his movies are badly made. I can’t really agree with that either though. Of the movies of his I’ve seen, Bay tells a complete story and the technical aspects of his filmmaking are very well done. He makes good movies, with very little fat in either the narrative or technical sense. Explosions aplenty perhaps, but he’s never claimed to be attempting to tell a story more complex than “Bad guys over there, good guys must thump them!” I will allow the argument that he makes stupid movies, but bad? Well, I’m not so sure. If pressed, I would claim that The Rock (a movie I loathed) has a much stronger narrative than Blade Runner. Let’s face it, storytelling was never Ridley’s strong point. Unlike Ridley Scott, Bay doesn’t have to leave half the movie on the cutting room floor to prevent each project from being 7 hours long. However, even when he fails, Ridley Scott always makes something pretty awesome. You always end you going “You magnificent bastard!”

No, the reason I don’t like Michael Bay is the reason I do like Roger Corman and several other cheap cinema directors. There are three kinds of movie experience, at least to my mind. On the one end of the spectrum you have “WOW! That was awesome!” in the middle you have “Eh, that was alright I suppose.” and then on the other end you have “What the fu…? I have no idea how to even process that.” You can stretch the spectrum wider by putting things in between the extremes. For example, you can put in “Well that was okay, but I’m not going to build a monument out of masheded patoes or anything.” and “Well, I can see what you were aiming for, pity you missed it.” if you really want to.

Out of these selections, it’s the middle ground that I hate landing in. Bay’s work always lands squarely in the “Meh” territory for me. Those are the movies that actually will get my hate when I think about it. When art has no impact or effect on me, that’s when I get offended by it. Stuff that’s competently made, but elicits no reaction from me is the worst. At least with the head scratchingly bad stuff you can grab your friend and scream “Did you understand one word of that? If so, I demand you explain it to me! If not, let us commiserate the fact that we have no idea what we just saw.” With the good stuff you can jump up and down, pump your fist, or just sit back and whisper “Yeah… right on.” depending on what movie it is. Artists at the top of their game? Awesome. Amateurs doing their best with limited funds? Awesome. Some one who wants to express something, only they’re not sure how to express it? Bring it on.

However, when it’s clear that a bunch of professionals just showed up, clocked in, did a good job, but just didn’t care… that’s when I get annoyed. I get so pissed seeing people given every advantage of money and resources just piss it away by making some soulless piece of garbage. Saying nothing, producing no feelings, just letting a slate of hollow actions run for two hours. If you’re going to just produce something with the consistency and flavor of library paste, why not just go become an insurance broker, a banker, or a Drive Time DJ at a Top 40 station. I would honestly prefer to watch an interesting train wreck of a movie that someone gave a damn about making than watch something where it’s clear everyone on set was just thinking about getting away for the weekend.

This is why you’ll always see me championing some piece of crap, even though it’s badly written, poorly acted, and ineptly directed. If it excites, confounds, or other wises engages me, I’m likely to enjoy most things. Even when it mostly fails, knowing how hard it is to get some of these movies made will at least make me respect them for getting the thing completed. I like knowing that some kind of passion was included, and a lack of passion always shows on the screen. Any time the cast and crew aren’t feeling it, you can sort of tell. Even if you’re not sure what it is exactly, you can see a problem. That’s why I don’t like Michael Bay’s stuff. He never seems to care, never seems to try to leave his comfort zone, just sort of works 8 hours and then goes home and has a beer.

I would rather he pushed, got passionate, and really tried to do something genuinely ambitious. Hence, I would like to see him try and remake Seven Samurai. Think about it a moment, if he has any talent, that would be the place to push it. He clearly understands the brotherhood of men, he gets soldiers, and he can do ensembles pretty well. Doing it as a modern tale, a medieval tale or even as a straight up samurai picture could really stretch him. It would at least be a great opportunity for him to crash in a way few have crashed before. He could get the money tom do that project right, he could get whatever people or writers he needed, I can think of no one besides perhaps Spielberg who could pool the resources that Bay could. It would either be great, or it would be an awesome train wreck.

Either way, it would be interesting and it might inflame some real passions for a change.

Sunday, June 20, 2010

TV Review: Tales from the Darkside – Distant Signals

1

Tales from the Darkside – Distant Signals (Season 2, Episode 8; First Broadcast November 17, 1985; Laurel Productions; Dir. Bill Travis)

1b


I always meant to have more TV reviews, but the truth is I don’t watch much TV. Is Lost still on? I don’t know. That joke’s gonna just get funnier and funnier the longer I put off actually posting this particular review. The thing is, I’m not all that into TV shows. Some people really like post 90s TV, with their continuing storylines that can stretch the entire season or even further. Me? I like the stripped down storytelling that a movie forces on the filmmaker. I don’t have to invest a huge amount of time, or examine each and every character in detail. I will admit, when I watch a TV show with a continual storyline, I like those shows better. Having everything tie up in a neat little package at the end of every episode bugs the hell out of me. Still, I’m a short story fan, even reading I prefer short stories to extended novels. Is it any wonder then, that my favorite kind of show is the anthology series? And is it any wonder that my favorite anthology series is Tales from the Darkside?


Saturday, June 12, 2010

Movie Review: Graffiti Bridge

Movie Review: Graffiti Bridge
1
Abandon all hope…

Graffiti Bridge (1990 Warner Bros Dir. Prince)

Fancy's Fun Facts: Technically, this is the end of a trilogy. We began with Purple Rain, continued with Under the Cherry Moon and now we are complete with this.

In 1990, everything started going wrong with Prince. The magic that had charmed him through the 80’s had worn off and he started a long and protracted decline. Between the name thing, the very public feud with Warner Brothers and the fact that the music really wasn’t kickin’ like it used to, the 90’s were a seriously hard time to be a Prince fan. While some may claim that the Batman album is where it all started to go wrong, or that Lovesexy was the signal that we were going down a different path, my own signal was Graffiti Bridge. Depending on who you listen to you’ll get different reasons but the fact is that Prince had a change of heart during the whole Black Album debacle. He trashed an album that was only days away from release and produced Lovesexy as a replacement. It’s at this time that the music and the man went through something of a spiritual shift. While Prince had always had a spiritual side to his music, it started to really shine during this period. Prince also started to resemble a hippy in many ways. He started talking about love and peace and spirituality and all that jazz quite a bit during this period, and it more or less culminated with this movie. Oh this movie…

Before we begin though, I’d like to personally endorse Bombay Sapphire Gin. I’m not sponsored by them*, but I couldn’t have gotten through this movie without their fine product.


Monday, June 7, 2010

Movie Review: Sherlock Holmes

1


Sherlock Holmes (2009 Warner Bros. Dir. Guy Ritchie)

Let’s have first things first and give the standard disclaimer. I’m not a big fan of Sherlock Holmes and Guy Ritchie only has about 50% success with me. I don’t like the leaps of logic Holmes makes, there are a myriad of explanations for most of the evidence he hangs things on and he could often be wrong. The fact that he is never even slightly mistaken always annoyed me when I read the stories. However, that’s got nothing to do with this movie, which I actually liked quite a bit.